Java Concurrency (&c)

I still get a lot of questions about whether double-checked locking works in Java, and I should probably post something to clear it up. And I'll plug Josh Bloch's new book, too. Double Checked Locking is this idiom: // Broken -- Do Not Use! class Foo {   private Helper helper = null;   public Helper getHelper() {     if (helper == null) {       synchronized(this) {         if (helper == null) {           helper = new Helper();         }       }     }   return helper; } The point of this code is to avoid synchronization when the object has already been constructed. This code doesn't work in Java. The basic principle is that compiler transformations (this includes the JIT, which is the optimizer that the JVM uses...

I was at JavaOne last week, and attended Bill Pugh's Defective Java talk. Bill had an important point about what kind of locks you want to be using and what kind you don't, and that point is worth repeating. Bill is, with Dave Hovemeyer, the guy behind FindBugs , which everyone should be using religiously. He was also my graduate advisor; we worked together on the new Java Memory Model. If there are two things Bill knows, they are concurrency and bug patterns. There is a tremendously useful defensive locking discipline that I use all of the time, and recommend that other people use, too: class Foo { private final Object lock = new Object(); private Bar lockProtectsMe; ... public void blah() { synchronized (lock) { // accesses LockProtectsMe... ... } } } This has the following benefits: If you try to acquire the lock on the Foo object instead of the lock, you run the risk that some code outside the class obtains that lock. Perhaps forever . Usi...